Feardotcom
Click Here ===== https://urlgoal.com/2tmcMv
Strange, how good "feardotcom" is, and how bad. The screenplay is a mess, and yet the visuals are so creative this is one of the rare bad films you might actually want to see. The plot is a bewildering jumble of half-baked ideas, from which we gather just enough of a glimmer about the story to understand how it is shot through with contradictions and paradoxes. And yet I watched in admiration as a self-contained nightmareformed with the visuals. Not many movies know how to do that.
Now. Do I recommend the film? Not for the majority of filmgoers, who will listen to the dialogue, and will expect a plot, and will be angered by the film's sins against logic (I do not even mention credibility). But if you have read this far because you are intrigued, because you can understand the kind of paradox I am describing, then you might very well enjoy "feardotcom." I give the total movie two stars, but there are some four-star elements that deserve a better movie. You have to know how to look for them, but they're there.
When four bodies are discovered among the industrial decay and urban grime of New York City, brash young detective Mike Reilly teams with ambitious Department of Health researcher Terry Huston to uncover the cause behind their violent and inexplicable deaths. The only common factor shared by the victims? Each died exactly 48 hours after logging onto a website called feardotcom.
Four bodies are found in New York City. The coincidence? They all died 48 hours after logging on to a site named feardotcom.com. Tough detective Mike Reilly collaborates with Department of Health associate Terry Huston to research these mysterious deaths. The only way to find out though what really happened is to enter the site itself...
Ambiguous Ending: At the end of the film, Terry gets a phone call with nothing but static. It's never revealed if this is Jeannie calling to "thank" her, or Mike trying to communicate with her. Asshole Victim: Pratt. Cold-Blooded Torture: What the website features. Department of Redundancy Department: feardotcom.com Disproportionate Retribution: The website will kill anyone who accesses it, regardless of their intent. Polidori and Denise are both cursed simply for investigating the site. This is especially harsh, as the site is interactive, and allows people to directly communicate with Jeannie before cursing them. Driven to Suicide: Denise. Their death confuses Mike at first because it doesn't fit the 48-hour pattern. Explosive Overclocking: The website destroys any computer that accesses it. Haunted Technology: The website was hijacked by the ghost of one of the victims of Alistair Pratt. Hoist by His Own Petard: Pratt is killed after Mike shows him Jeannie's website, which happens to be the site Pratt used to broadcast Jeannie's torture and murder. Kick the Dog: Jeannie appears to Polidori as he's dying, first in her child form, then her ghost form. This is after he tried to save her child form from being hit by a train. murder.com: The titular website, feardotcom.com. No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Polidori is killed trying to save Child!Jeannie from an oncoming train. Ominous Visual Glitch: Whenever people click on the site, it first manifests as a dark blot spreading across the screen. At the end of the film, when Jeannie traps Pratt's soul in Cyberspace, it's shown as a sepia version of reality which is constantly glitching and shimmering. Riddle for the Ages: It's never revealed why Terry gets a phone call at the end. Serial Killer / Deadly Doctor: Alistair "The Doctor" Pratt. Shout-Out: The underwater sequence where Terry finds Jeannie's body in a flooded steel mill is clearly inspired by Inferno. Jeannie's child form, a little girl with platinum blonde hair and a white ball, is taken directly from Toby Dammit. Too Dumb to Live: The man who goes directly into the path of the subway train.
See below for the exact times and descriptions of the 5 jump scares in FearDotCom, which has a jump scare rating of 1.0.Jump Scare Rating: While the horror is pretty cheap and gratuitous, there are surprisingly very few jump scares throughout the film.Synopsis: A detective investigates a string of mysterious deaths in New York City where all victims share the common pattern of logging into a website called feardotcom 48 hours before their deaths.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[970,250],'wheresthejump_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_4',176,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-wheresthejump_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0');Contributor: Frogge contributed all the information on this page (Sign up now to become a contributor too! Learn more)Jump Scares: 5 (5 minor)Reviews: IMDb, Rotten TomatoesRating: RDirector: William MaloneRuntime: 101 minutesNetflix (US): NoTags: Crime, Supernatural, Thriller
With SARS (literally) in the air and The Ring one of the year's UK box office mega hits, you'd think the heavens were aligning for feardotcom in 2003. Shame it's such a disaster on every level. Like The Ring, it marries universal supernatural terrors with specific new technology; but here, an infuriatingly pedantic script, impotent direction and curiously uncommitted performances ensure that it'll end up on 2003's Ten Worst list.
"Do you like to watch?" asks the husky-voiced temptress on the feardotcom.com website. Click "yes" and you'll see The Doctor (Stephen Rea) carving up bare-breasted beauties for his internet subscribers. You'll also cark it within 48 hours as your eyeballs start gushing blood. That'll teach you to surf for porn sites.
The film uneasily vies between mundane and supernatural explanations as to what is happening. Later revelations show that the film has misleadingly given us the impression the feardotcom.com website is the place where Stephen Rea is torturing his victims, whereas it is in fact the place where the ghost girl resides, although it is not at all clear why, when she wants her murder avenged, that the girl is lurking at a snuff internet site and then emerging to kill victims that randomly log on, or even what she is doing on the internet in the first place. In lieu of explanation, we are given a downrightly nonsensical speech from Michael Sarrazin about the internet having its own energy. 59ce067264
https://www.coletterabba.com/forum/general-discussion/subtitle-my-big-fat-greek-wedding
https://www.shorttracktalk.com/forum/welcome-to-the-forum/pdo-mp4
https://www.lion-design.co.uk/group/mysite-200-group/discussion/64ec01af-e199-479b-ae9c-b72e7afa081f